raw rna seq data (Databank Inc)
Structured Review

Raw Rna Seq Data, supplied by Databank Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/raw rna seq data/product/Databank Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "DHODH regulates trophoblast fusion via IFITM-reduced plasma membrane fluidity: Implications for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy"
Article Title: DHODH regulates trophoblast fusion via IFITM-reduced plasma membrane fluidity: Implications for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Journal: iScience
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.116163
Figure Legend Snippet: Increased IFITM and decreased DHODH expression characterize the placenta in the context of HDPs (A) Volcano plot of transcriptomic changes identified by RNA-seq. Transcripts highlighted in red or blue were significantly altered ( q value < 0.05). (B) Differentially expressed genes were classified by functional enrichment analysis using the Reactome pathway database and Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes or cellular components. (C) Heatmap of mitochondria-related genes downregulated in the placenta in the context of HDPs. Genes with higher expression are shown in green, and those with lower expression are shown in red. Ctrl: premature delivery, n = 5; HDP, n = 5. (D) Expression of DHODH, OPA1, DNM1L, MFN1, TFAM, and IFITM1-3 in trophoblast BeWo cells treated with forskolin (FSK, 2.5 μM) and rotenone (Rote, 50 nM) for 48 h. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. FSK alone (Tukey’s test). (E) Expression of IFITMs in BeWo cells treated with FSK (2.5 μM), orludodstat (Orlu, 1 nM), or brequinar (Bre, 25 nM) for 48 h. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. Ctrl; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. FSK alone (Tukey’s test).
Techniques Used: Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: DHODH regulates IFITM expression via IRF1 (A–H) BeWo cells or DHODH-KD BeWo cells were treated with FSK (2.5 μM), Orlu (1 nM), or Bre (25 nM) for 48 h. (A) Volcano plot showing transcriptomic changes identified by RNA-seq. Transcripts highlighted in red or blue were considered differentially expressed, as indicated by an expression change ≥2-fold ( p < 0.05). (B) Correlation analysis of RNA-seq data from Orlu-, Bre-treated, and DHODH-KD cells. (C) Differentially expressed genes were classified by functional enrichment analysis using the Wiki pathway database and GO biological processes or cellular components. (D) RNA-seq was used to evaluate the expression levels of genes associated with syncytialization. (E) RNA-seq was used to evaluate the expression levels of IRF family genes. (F) Immunoblotting for IRF1, total IRF3, and p -IRF3. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Representative data from three independent experiments are shown. The graph shows the total IRF3 and p -IRF3 levels normalized to GAPDH levels from three independent experiments. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. Ctrl (Tukey’s test). Values represent the mean ± SEM. (G) ChIP assay showing IRF1 binding to upstream regulatory regions (up to 3 kbp) of the IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3 loci in BeWo cells treated with FSK alone (2.5 μM) for 48 h. ∗ p < 0.05 vs. Ctrl; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, ††† p < 0.001 vs. FSK alone (Tukey’s test). (H) Immunofluorescence staining of IRF1 (red). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. The graph shows the number of staining cells from three independent experiments. Values represent the mean ± SEM. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. FSK.
Techniques Used: Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay, Western Blot, Control, Binding Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining
![a) Log 2 ([elevated temperature/control] average total accumulation) of metabolic categories (n≥3) at six different seed developmental stages. b) Untargeted metabolomic data statistical analysis. c) Differentially accumulated metabolic features during seed development. d) Number of major metabolic categories (Flavonoids, Cinnamic acids and derivatives, and Glucosinolates) induced by elevated temperature at each seed developmental stage. e) <t>Transcriptomic</t> data statistical analysis. f) Differentially expressed genes during seed development. g) Percentages of genes coding for enzymes putatively involved in specialized metabolite modifications (Acyltransferases, Glycosyltransferases, Hydroxylases and Methyltransferases) induced, and repressed, at each seed developmental stage by elevated temperature.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_04/10__64898_slash_2026__06__03__729804/10__64898_slash_2026__06__03__729804___F1.large.jpg)
